I think I will patent a process I will call 'Eating'.
A person opens their mouth and an object we will call food is inserted by the left or right hand sometimes on a fork. The food is chewed in the jaw and is subsequently swallowed and digested in the stomach.
Once this is filled and approved I guess anyone doing the above mentioned will have to pay me a fee.
Firefox 3 RC2 is fantastic. I will certainly download the final release. Best browser available. Call me a party pooper, but I will wait a day until the download servers are quiet.
Paris, because she is foxy fiery party trouper and knows full well what a final release is.
But... All I want Ofcom to do now is investigate the illegalities that appear to have gone on by BT and Phorm (121Media) during the older (soon to be renamed) 'WebWise' trials. These also affected customer speeds as well as being an illegal interception.
I must admit this point never crossed my mind. Surely this Webwise interception totally undermines also some of the legal advertising business models by Google, MSN and Yahoo to name a few.
Why are they not reacting more noisily? They have a very good UK legal case (watertight?) made out by Dr Richard Clayton and the FIPR who have done all of the hard technical and legal analysis work indirectly for them in their papers. Does Google, I wonder, already know of court action being prepared behind the scenes?
Incidentally, who has the definitive list of OIX partners so that I can ensure that I never do any sort of business with them in any manner or form?
Register
14 posts • joined Wednesday 2nd April 2008 22:58 GMT
Eating
I think I will patent a process I will call 'Eating'.
A person opens their mouth and an object we will call food is inserted by the left or right hand sometimes on a fork. The food is chewed in the jaw and is subsequently swallowed and digested in the stomach.
Once this is filled and approved I guess anyone doing the above mentioned will have to pay me a fee.
Easy money!!! Yippee
Simple Answer
Stop using your customers as Beta testers on 'Release' versions. Get some proper testers with some proper testing schedules.
Confirmed - Google does not respect your privacy
If it had any inkling of respect it would not shipped out this spyware ridden release - Spyware because you were opted in without you knowing!
Obviously in Google's eyes : Google Profit > Customer Privacy
What happened to parliment
I thought we had got rid of the monarchy and had an elected parliament to make lawful decisions.
President Mandleson - unelected at that.
The Obvious
Mask the password but allow the user by a check box to see what they are typing via a simple click. Not so hard!!!!
They deserve to be made an example of
Anybody, (Including Phorm) that wants to go with this Opt out model concerning privacy should be hung drawn and quartered.
@By KenBW2
But vary rarely does anything break!
Firefox 3
Firefox 3 RC2 is fantastic. I will certainly download the final release. Best browser available. Call me a party pooper, but I will wait a day until the download servers are quiet.
Paris, because she is foxy fiery party trouper and knows full well what a final release is.
Remember, who is looking at your data
Check out Phorm's history on the Wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phorm
Ask yourself. Do you want this organisation profiling your data?
I Welcomed the report
But... All I want Ofcom to do now is investigate the illegalities that appear to have gone on by BT and Phorm (121Media) during the older (soon to be renamed) 'WebWise' trials. These also affected customer speeds as well as being an illegal interception.
We did invent it!
Clearly ,Gordon Invented we Invented the Ipod, so what's the problem?
Paris because she clearly did not invent it either.
re: @Eponymous Cowherd
I must admit this point never crossed my mind. Surely this Webwise interception totally undermines also some of the legal advertising business models by Google, MSN and Yahoo to name a few.
Why are they not reacting more noisily? They have a very good UK legal case (watertight?) made out by Dr Richard Clayton and the FIPR who have done all of the hard technical and legal analysis work indirectly for them in their papers. Does Google, I wonder, already know of court action being prepared behind the scenes?
Incidentally, who has the definitive list of OIX partners so that I can ensure that I never do any sort of business with them in any manner or form?
Richard Clayton in the BBC headlines again
After visiting Phorm, He says it is still illegal
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7331493.stm
I've cracked it
Pardon me if someone else has already spotted this but PHORM is an anagram for MORPH . Same person different 'form'.