"And the question remains, will consumers care about not possessing the files? There are clear advantages in not doing so: you don't need buckets of local storage, and you don't have to fear losing your collection to burglars or housefires."
And the disadvantages? Such as losing any control over access to the content provider (See Amazon, 1984)? Such as not being able to use the content when your internet connection is down? Such as being constrained (still) in your choice of device (e.g, no Apple, what about Open Source devices)?
This sounds more like a recycled press release than actual reporting. I expect more of you, Tony.
And...
"And the question remains, will consumers care about not possessing the files? There are clear advantages in not doing so: you don't need buckets of local storage, and you don't have to fear losing your collection to burglars or housefires."
And the disadvantages? Such as losing any control over access to the content provider (See Amazon, 1984)? Such as not being able to use the content when your internet connection is down? Such as being constrained (still) in your choice of device (e.g, no Apple, what about Open Source devices)?
This sounds more like a recycled press release than actual reporting. I expect more of you, Tony.
Besides, UV may seem cool, but IR is HOT!