The Wii has the price (and the 'novelty' control system'), but the PS3 has neither.
Me personally, I own a Wii and a 360. I only shelled out £180 on the Wii because it was cheap, I was intrigued by it, and considered Zelda and Red Steel to be worthwhile software. 7 months later and I rarely turn it on,
Who's going to spend £400+ on a console just because they're 'intrigued' by it? No-one! Right now the PS3 is for hardcore gamers and Sony fanboys only.
Its been said before, but Sony need the A+ games now, more than they need a price drop. Because even if the PS3 was significantly cheaper, there's still no games to warrant purchasing it!
Register
Title
It comes down to price and quality of games.
The Wii has the price (and the 'novelty' control system'), but the PS3 has neither.
Me personally, I own a Wii and a 360. I only shelled out £180 on the Wii because it was cheap, I was intrigued by it, and considered Zelda and Red Steel to be worthwhile software. 7 months later and I rarely turn it on,
Who's going to spend £400+ on a console just because they're 'intrigued' by it? No-one! Right now the PS3 is for hardcore gamers and Sony fanboys only.
Its been said before, but Sony need the A+ games now, more than they need a price drop. Because even if the PS3 was significantly cheaper, there's still no games to warrant purchasing it!