Some people want to be able to prove who they are beyond all doubt, anti identity theft (whatever that means), and they complain when a social engineering hack shows weaknesses in lax processes or the ability to set up a direct debit for someone else.
Some people don't want to be identified, the liberal (no2id) crowd insist they shouldn't have to be able to prove who they are.
OK, so a token with RSA style cycling, two part biometric scanning and a password will solve the (so called) identity theft but at the cost of privacy.
What do you want?
It's one or the other, find something that does both and apart from solving this little dichotomy you may well become very rich.
Register
The bigger issue is not social engineering......
There's a war coming......
Some people want to be able to prove who they are beyond all doubt, anti identity theft (whatever that means), and they complain when a social engineering hack shows weaknesses in lax processes or the ability to set up a direct debit for someone else.
Some people don't want to be identified, the liberal (no2id) crowd insist they shouldn't have to be able to prove who they are.
OK, so a token with RSA style cycling, two part biometric scanning and a password will solve the (so called) identity theft but at the cost of privacy.
What do you want?
It's one or the other, find something that does both and apart from solving this little dichotomy you may well become very rich.