Firefox 3.6.9 release candidate rocks up for sturdy testers
Mozilla pumped out a release candidate version of Firefox 3.6.9 yesterday.
The pre-beta update is intended only for brave souls willing and able to have a poke around in the unfinished code.
“Please hammer on these builds mercilessly to make sure that things work well! If you notice things that worked in previous Firefox 3.6.8 …
Mine is 4.0b4. How many different FF streams are there? And how big a deal can 3.6.9 RC be compared to 4.0b4? And how can an RC be for "sturdy testers". Surely it's for anybody who is a little curious. It's an RC. It should be 99% right. Or more.
I run 3.6.9 on 2 machines and 4.04b on another machine and the only reason I have not upgraded all to the 4.04 is that the addons are a little far behind:-( Apart from that it's great....
Runs FF 3.5.11 normally this week, also runs 4.04b just fine as well.
Sometimes I try something that was just released separately installed, but considering the entire OS is experimental with network builds every other day its not saying much... but they all work great.
This is a 64 bit rolling release system, it is always in upgrade mode.
Register
Firefox 3.6.9 release candidate rocks up for sturdy testers
Mozilla pumped out a release candidate version of Firefox 3.6.9 yesterday. The pre-beta update is intended only for brave souls willing and able to have a poke around in the unfinished code. “Please hammer on these builds mercilessly to make sure that things work well! If you notice things that worked in previous Firefox 3.6.8 …
This topic is closed for new posts.
Posted Friday 27th August 2010 12:15 GMT
Anonymous Coward
Nightly builds #
firefox 4 dev builds also available nightly known as minefield for the hardcore only.
Posted Friday 27th August 2010 14:31 GMT
Fatman
Nightly builds #
Yes, it can be very interesting to play with the nightlies. I just downloaded today's (Aug 27) nightly, and have yet to install it.
Grenade, because playing with nightlies CAN be dangerous!
This post has been deleted by its author
Posted Friday 27th August 2010 22:41 GMT
Anonymous Coward
No, I didn't want to know. #
Now go back to your cave.
Posted Friday 27th August 2010 14:37 GMT
twunt
Surely #
The RELEASE CANDIDATE comes after the Beta?
Posted Friday 27th August 2010 22:41 GMT
Merchman
STOP! #
(See sub heading)
Mines the one with matching parachute pants
Posted Friday 27th August 2010 23:07 GMT
Shades
"Firefox 3.5.12 is ready to test drive" #
Eh? My current version is 3.6.8
Posted Monday 30th August 2010 04:55 GMT
Kevin (Just Kevin)
3.6? #
Mine is 4.0b4. How many different FF streams are there? And how big a deal can 3.6.9 RC be compared to 4.0b4? And how can an RC be for "sturdy testers". Surely it's for anybody who is a little curious. It's an RC. It should be 99% right. Or more.
Posted Monday 30th August 2010 07:49 GMT
Deadly_NZ
FF versions #
I run 3.6.9 on 2 machines and 4.04b on another machine and the only reason I have not upgraded all to the 4.04 is that the addons are a little far behind:-( Apart from that it's great....
Posted Tuesday 31st August 2010 13:03 GMT
Cameron Colley
Try Add-on conpatibility reporter? #
Apart from a couple of nightly builds a few weeks ago breaking with NoScript and AddBlock I have 4.04b working fine with my add-ons.
I wouldn't mind, but I only started using it so I could get a 64bit version of FF running under Debian...
Posted Thursday 2nd September 2010 09:38 GMT
Cyfaill
64 bit Debian - Derivative sidux #
Runs FF 3.5.11 normally this week, also runs 4.04b just fine as well.
Sometimes I try something that was just released separately installed, but considering the entire OS is experimental with network builds every other day its not saying much... but they all work great.
This is a 64 bit rolling release system, it is always in upgrade mode.
This topic is closed for new posts.