Mozilla is tinkering with multiple applications for the Apple iPhone. And no, that doesn't include a Firefox browser.
"There is something of the Firefox and Mozilla experience that might be possible on the iPhone - that isn't the Firefox browser. We've got some people prototyping some ideas that may end up becoming iPhone …
A title is required, and must contain letters and/or digits.
#
Technically you could release a web browser as HTML is not "run" - although you wouldn't be allowed to run javascript, which would limit the usefulness to an extent...
Just can't wait till Apple are forced to open up the platform to third party developers without having to use Itunes and been approved by the App store and all this malarky. It will happen, it is just a matter of when.
I really hope Apple get a serious telling off from the European Anti Trust regulators because this is stifling developers who want to build apps for this platform but who don't want to give 25 % of their apps turnover to Apple.
Paris, because she is always open (dunno if she charges though :)
Posted Wednesday 11th November 2009 23:50 GMT
Anonymous Coward
re A title is required, and must contain letters and/or digits.
#
Technically you could release a web browser as HTML is not "run" - although you wouldn't be allowed to run javascript, which would improve security no end...
Register
Mozilla brews browserless iPhone apps
Mozilla is tinkering with multiple applications for the Apple iPhone. And no, that doesn't include a Firefox browser. "There is something of the Firefox and Mozilla experience that might be possible on the iPhone - that isn't the Firefox browser. We've got some people prototyping some ideas that may end up becoming iPhone …
This topic is closed for new posts.
Posted Wednesday 11th November 2009 18:58 GMT
Anonymous Coward
Mozilla are right #
iPhoney is a relatively closed platform, despite the number of apps.
Posted Wednesday 11th November 2009 19:18 GMT
deive
A title is required, and must contain letters and/or digits. #
Technically you could release a web browser as HTML is not "run" - although you wouldn't be allowed to run javascript, which would limit the usefulness to an extent...
Posted Wednesday 11th November 2009 19:38 GMT
Anti-Apple
Apple who....... #
Just can't wait till Apple are forced to open up the platform to third party developers without having to use Itunes and been approved by the App store and all this malarky. It will happen, it is just a matter of when.
I really hope Apple get a serious telling off from the European Anti Trust regulators because this is stifling developers who want to build apps for this platform but who don't want to give 25 % of their apps turnover to Apple.
Paris, because she is always open (dunno if she charges though :)
Posted Wednesday 11th November 2009 23:50 GMT
Anonymous Coward
re A title is required, and must contain letters and/or digits. #
Technically you could release a web browser as HTML is not "run" - although you wouldn't be allowed to run javascript, which would improve security no end...
Fixed it for ya.
This post has been deleted by its author
Posted Thursday 12th November 2009 19:39 GMT
Anonymous Coward
Other browser #
FUD: "If you agree to their SDK, you cannot build another browser."
Then what are those tens of other browsers that you can buy or download for free from the App Store? Not browsers?
This statement is complete bollocks.
This topic is closed for new posts.