Taking on Google may seem a tall order to some, but it's one that Samsung clearly isn’t afraid of. The manufacturer has launched its own open mobile platform, Bada, as an alternative to Android.
The platform only allows developers to write applications for Samsung handsets, the firm said, yet is apparently "simple to use" and " …
The platform only allows developers to write applications for Samsung handsets...
I stopped reading at this point. Why can't this short-sighted lot focus on a single open platform instead of this pointless, narcissistic "me too" approach. It was the death of Nokia and will lead to the demise of others as things progress. We've now got 2 routes MAC v ANDROID.
Reminds me of the Eighties MAC v MSFT. Same old attitude from Apple suggests that this one's going the same way.
Oh yeah, developers will just FLOCK to writing applications for one manufacturer when they could be writing for an OS that will show up on many more handsets from many manufacturers. Or if they really want to write for a single-source platform, they could write for the one that's well known, established, and has cultish followers.
That is ironic since this will be dead in the water. It's hard enough for Google to get an app store together that will rival the iPhone app store. How is Samsung, a single vendor going to do it?
Judging by the competence of the Samsung bits of code on my Galaxy, this developer will be in no hurry to cross swords with an all-Samsung software environment.
Massive, massive fail...I mean, WTF are their execs thinking???
This is why I am happy I no longer work in a telco - apparently even mobile device vendors have reached the stage where it isn't about earning money for the firm that counts, it is enhancing your kingdom within the firm even if it looses money. This is obviously some exec's idea on how to build up a new domain of responsibility and get himself noticed...even if it will certainly fail. He's just hoping it fails AFTER he has his promotion...
Remember kids, we never get the products that we want in the marketplace, we get the products that some executives have decided they could get promoted by selling to us...and in many corporations these things are not in alignment...
Only for those with no life or friends. I hope that the rest of us (excluding the scumbags in Marketing) just want our phones to work for more than 6 hours before running out of power due to all of the useless bloatware stuck on them.
...'Acme' phones---after that ubiquitous purveyor of all things needful (especially needful to coyotes in pursuit of roadrunners).
Anyway, generic handsets where the user can pick and choose what OS they want to use. This would probably rule out some more proprietary phone OSs, but, hey ho, small loss.
Samsung to offer open Android alternative
Taking on Google may seem a tall order to some, but it's one that Samsung clearly isn’t afraid of. The manufacturer has launched its own open mobile platform, Bada, as an alternative to Android. The platform only allows developers to write applications for Samsung handsets, the firm said, yet is apparently "simple to use" and " …
This topic is closed for new posts.
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 13:27 GMT
Buck Futter
Ooooh! Ooooh! #
Can I be the first to say:
Default search engine: Bing!
For that bada-bing! experience
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 13:28 GMT
IT specialist
Windows Mobile discontinued #
Samsung will be phasing out Windows Mobile and Symbian to make way for bada and Android.
It's a kick in Microsoft's guts. The carcass of Windows Mobile is flapping in the breeze.
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 13:28 GMT
Anonymous Coward
So if you don't use google to look for more info... #
... might you do a "Bada bing"?
/coat
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 13:28 GMT
James 5
Oh my god ... #
“a fun and diverse mobile experience”
and
"invitation to adventure"
it's Effen phone with software bits. It's hardly a major life enhancing event - when will these morons get real?
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 13:28 GMT
SpanglySi
Please.... #
Let it be integrated with the MS search site - Bada Bing is too good a possibility to pass up.
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 13:28 GMT
Jay Jaffa
A samsung only SDK - that's a good idea #
The platform only allows developers to write applications for Samsung handsets...
I stopped reading at this point. Why can't this short-sighted lot focus on a single open platform instead of this pointless, narcissistic "me too" approach. It was the death of Nokia and will lead to the demise of others as things progress. We've now got 2 routes MAC v ANDROID.
Reminds me of the Eighties MAC v MSFT. Same old attitude from Apple suggests that this one's going the same way.
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 13:28 GMT
Anonymous Coward
A day late and a dollar short #
Oh yeah, developers will just FLOCK to writing applications for one manufacturer when they could be writing for an OS that will show up on many more handsets from many manufacturers. Or if they really want to write for a single-source platform, they could write for the one that's well known, established, and has cultish followers.
FAIL icon only because there's no MASSIVE FAIL
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 13:28 GMT
Richard Joseph
Is that.. #
...Bada meaning bad or Bada meaning good (cue rhythm and scratching) .
I'll get my coat and my Kangol hat....
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 13:28 GMT
Jim Avery
bada for business #
"bada for business"
Is that really what Samsung want to say about their new platform?
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 13:28 GMT
Roni Leben
0xbada #
You can write the name in a 32bit register...
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 13:28 GMT
Anonymous Coward
Waste of time #
"it means 'ocean' in Korean"
That is ironic since this will be dead in the water. It's hard enough for Google to get an app store together that will rival the iPhone app store. How is Samsung, a single vendor going to do it?
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 13:28 GMT
Anonymous Coward
If they partner with M$ Search #
... it'll be called 'Bada Bing'.
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 16:31 GMT
Jim Hague
Samsung code quality #
Judging by the competence of the Samsung bits of code on my Galaxy, this developer will be in no hurry to cross swords with an all-Samsung software environment.
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 16:31 GMT
Raithmir
Samsung have poor Android support already... #
...guess that's only going to get worse if they're trying to develop a competitor OS. :(
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 16:31 GMT
Robert Hill
Once more... #
it's merely a "drop in the ocean..."
Massive, massive fail...I mean, WTF are their execs thinking???
This is why I am happy I no longer work in a telco - apparently even mobile device vendors have reached the stage where it isn't about earning money for the firm that counts, it is enhancing your kingdom within the firm even if it looses money. This is obviously some exec's idea on how to build up a new domain of responsibility and get himself noticed...even if it will certainly fail. He's just hoping it fails AFTER he has his promotion...
Remember kids, we never get the products that we want in the marketplace, we get the products that some executives have decided they could get promoted by selling to us...and in many corporations these things are not in alignment...
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 16:31 GMT
Jason Hall
Samsung OS #
I've said it before, and I'll say it again...
An OS/UI deisgned by Samsung.... hahahahahahahah ahahahahahahhaha ahahahahahahah
Idiots.
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 16:31 GMT
Aristotles slow and dimwitted horse
Missing the point somewhat... #
“a fun and diverse mobile experience”.
Only for those with no life or friends. I hope that the rest of us (excluding the scumbags in Marketing) just want our phones to work for more than 6 hours before running out of power due to all of the useless bloatware stuck on them.
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 16:31 GMT
Anonymous Coward
They should let apple in- #
Stick it on the iphone, so we have bada-boom.
Ahem.
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 16:31 GMT
Adair
I vote for.. #
...'Acme' phones---after that ubiquitous purveyor of all things needful (especially needful to coyotes in pursuit of roadrunners).
Anyway, generic handsets where the user can pick and choose what OS they want to use. This would probably rule out some more proprietary phone OSs, but, hey ho, small loss.
Posted Tuesday 10th November 2009 21:35 GMT
Lars
Samsung’s assault on Android ? #
Google is using Linux and call it Android.
Nokia is using Linux and call it Maemo.
Samsung is using Linux and call it Bada.
Then there is Moblin, OpenMoko and so on.
So what kind of an assault is that.
If you really want to have a look at who is using Linux then have a look at.
http://www.linuxfordevices.com
and click on mobile phones.
Posted Wednesday 11th November 2009 14:53 GMT
Anonymous Coward
So its Not... #
Named after: Douglas Bader, cos he was semi cyborg, not an Android!
This topic is closed for new posts.